怎样写文献综述?

问题描述:文献综述都是大牛写的吗?
, , ,
[已重置]:

一篇文献综述的好坏更多的在于方向是否够全,参考内容是否够新,文献是否是top。
大方向概括之类的综述俯拾即是,似乎每一条都是康庄大道。但是,我个人更喜欢路边的警示牌,有一些综述,会比较一些研究方法和成果,告诉你谁比谁的数值更高,然后我就去看那个差的,看看他为啥犯错。我觉得研究最重要的事情是填坑,等大量的人把坑都填了,自然就出成果了。但是现在发文大家都说自己做的结果多牛逼,却绝口不提坑的事情,只能让有经验的人从字里行间推测华丽辞草背后实际的含义。不过这样也很有趣,只是太耗费时间精力了。


SisPola:

豆瓣上看的,很受用,截图下来了,侵删~


Aorqu用户:
1.明确你想讨论的问题
2.看看别人说了啥
3.说说你的看法
4.要注意有理有据哦


田宇:

从工科研究所角度回答。
1、写文献综述需要建立在大量文献阅读的基础上。先简单说一下如何独立自主地建立起自己的文献资料库。(因为有的导师会给出指导)
1.1、从自然科学的研究方面来讲,主要阅读的文献应该是英文文献。这是大陆长期学术氛围所导致的,大家有好的结果,都会去写英文文献。
1.2、web of knowledge是良好的搜索来源。根据所要研究的方向,输入关键词进行检索,寻找其中发表在权威杂志上的文献来阅读。
1.3、在阅读一篇英文文献的过程中,要注意introduction中的部分,其中作者会提到很多前人的工作,再去查找这其中的文献。从而大致的概念就是,以一篇文献为基础,展开到更多的文献。
1.4、当你发现阅读到的一些文献有交集时,就可以进行一些概括。为什么会有交集?是不是谈到了一些共同的问题?或者采用了一些共同的方法?或是这篇文献是这个领域的基础?

2、在阅读完大量文献的基础上,对所研究领域有了较为概括性的看法后,可以开始思考文献综述。
2.1、文献综述也是需要点子的,不是简单的概括。例如,针对某一个研究方法的综述,某一个方面历史发展过来的综述等等。
2.2、对于参考文献作者的研究也十分重要。追溯作者的课题组,以及课题组的历史,可以发现很多研究小组在某种程度上都有联系,这是很好的着力点。研究者总会从其他研究者那里得到灵感,或者对其他研究者进行发展或反驳。针对这些关系也是很好的综述展开的来源。


霍惑惑:

非常感谢大家的回答。俺找到了这篇,觉得非常有用,贴上来分享:
What is a literature review?
A literature review is not an annotated bibliography in which you summarize briefly each article that you have reviewed. While a summary of the what you have read is contained within the literature review, it goes well beyond merely summarizing professional literature. It focuses on a specific topic of interest to you and includes a critical analysis of the relationship among different works, and relating this research to your work. It may be written as a stand-alone paper or to provide a theoretical framework and rationale for a research study (such as a thesis or dissertation).
Step-by-step guide
These guidelines are adapted primarily from Galvan (2006). Galvan outlines a very clear, step-by-step approach that is very useful to use as you write your review. I have integrated some other tips within this guide, particularly in suggesting different technology tools that you might want to consider in helping you organize your review. In the sections from Step 6-9 what I have included is the outline of those steps exactly as described by Galvan. I also provide links at the end of this guide to resources that you should use in order to search the literature and as you write your review.
In addition to using the step-by-step guide that I have provided below, I also recommend that you (a) locate examples of literature reviews in your field of study and skim over these to get a feel for what a literature review is and how these are written (I have also provided links to a couple of examples at the end of these guidelines (b) read over other guides to writing literature reviews so that you see different perspectives and approaches: Some examples are:
1 Review of Literature: University of Wisconsin – Madison The Writing Center.
2 How to ..Write a Literature Review: University of California, Santa Cruz University Library).
3 Information Fluency – Literature Review: Washington & Lee University
4 How to Do A Literature Review? North Carolina A&T State University F.D. Bluford Library.
5 Writing up research: using the literature. Language Center, Asian Institute of Technology (Thailand).
6 Selected Links to Resources on Writing a Literature Review
Step 1: Review APA guidelines
Read through the links provided below on APA guidelines so that you become familiar with the common core elements of how to write in APA style: in particular, pay attention to general document guidelines (e.g. font, margins, spacing), title page, abstract, body, text citations, quotations.
Step 2: Decide on a topic
It will help you considerably if your topic for your literature review is the one on which you intend to do your final M.Ed. project, or is in some way related to the topic of your final project. However, you may pick any scholarly topic.

Step 3: Identify the literature that you will review:
7 Familiarize yourself with online databases (see UMD library resource links below for help with this), identifying relevant databases in your field of study.
8 Using relevant databases, search for literature sources using Google Scholar and also searching using Furl (search all sources, including the Furl accounts of other Furl members). Some tips for identifying suitable literature and narrowing your search :
8 Start with a general descriptor from the database thesaurus or one that you know is already a well defined descriptor based on past work that you have done in this field. You will need to experiment with different searches, such as limiting your search to descriptors that appear only in the document titles, or in both the document title and in the abstract.
8 Redefine your topic if needed: as you search you will quickly find out if the topic that you are reviewing is too broad. Try to narrow it to a specific area of interest within the broad area that you have chosen (remember: this is merely an introductory literature review for Educ 7001). It is a good idea, as part of your literature search, to look for existing literature reviews that have already been written on this topic.
8 As part of your search, be sure to identify landmark or classic studies and theorists as these provide you with a framework/context for your study.
9 Import your references into your RefWorks account (see: Refworks Import Directions for guide on how to do this from different databases). You can also enter references manually into RefWorks if you need to.
Step 4: Analyze the literature
Once you have identified and located the articles for your review, you need to analyze them and organize them before you begin writing:
10 Overview the articles: Skim the articles to get an idea of the general purpose and content of the article (focus your reading here on the abstract, introduction and first few paragraphs, the conclusion of each article. Tip: as you skim the articles, you may want to record the notes that you take on each directly into RefWorks in the box for User 1. You can take notes onto note cards or into a word processing document instead or as well as using RefWorks, but having your notes in RefWorks makes it easy to organize your notes later.
11 Group the articles into categories (e.g. into topics and subtopics and chronologically within each subtopic). Once again, it’s useful to enter this information into your RefWorks record. You can record the topics in the same box as before (User 1) or use User 2 box for the topic(s) under which you have chosen to place this article.
12 Take notes:
12 Decide on the format in which you will take notes as you read the articles (as mentioned above, you can do this in RefWorks. You can also do this using a Word Processor, or a concept mapping program like Inspiration (free 30 trial download), a data base program (e.g. Access or File Maker Pro), in an Excel spreadsheet, or the “old-fashioned” way of using note cards. Be consistent in how you record notes.
12 Define key terms: look for differences in the way keys terms are defined (note these differences).
12 Note key statistics that you may want to use in the introduction to your review.
12 Select useful quotes that you may want to include in your review. Important: If you copy the exact words from an article, be sure to cite the page number as you will need this should you decide to use the quote when you write your review (as direct quotes must always be accompanied by page references). To ensure that you have quoted accurately (and to save time in note taking), if you are accessing the article in a format that allows this, you can copy and paste using your computer “edit –> copy –> paste” functions. Note: although you may collect a large number of quotes during the note taking phase of your review, when you write the review, use quotes very sparingly. The rule I follow is to quote only when when some key meaning would be lost in translation if I were to paraphrase the original author’s words, or if using the original words adds special emphasis to a point that I am making.
12 Note emphases, strengths & weaknesses: Since different research studies focus on different aspects of the issue being studied, each article that you read will have different emphases, strengths. and weaknesses. Your role as a reviewer is to evaluate what you read, so that your review is not a mere description of different articles, but rather a critical analysis that makes sense of the collection of articles that you are reviewing. Critique the research methodologies used in the studies, and distinguish between assertions (the author’s opinion) and actual research findings (derived from empirical evidence).
12 Identify major trends or patterns: As you read a range of articles on your topic, you should make note of trends and patterns over time as reported in the literature. This step requires you to synthesize and make sense of what you read, since these patterns and trends may not be spelled out in the literature, but rather become apparent to you as you review the big picture that has emerged over time. Your analysis can make generalizations across a majority of studies, but should also note inconsistencies across studies and over time.
12 Identify gaps in the literature, and reflect on why these might exist (based on the understandings that you have gained by reading literature in this field of study). These gaps will be important for you to address as you plan and write your review.
12 Identify relationships among studies: note relationships among studies, such as which studies were landmark ones that led to subsequent studies in the same area. You may also note that studies fall into different categories (categories that you see emerging or ones that are already discussed in the literature). When you write your review, you should address these relationships and different categories and discuss relevant studies using this as a framework.
12 Keep your review focused on your topic: make sure that the articles you find are relevant and directly related to your topic. As you take notes, record which specific aspects of the article you are reading are relevant to your topic (as you read you will come up with key descriptors that you can record in your notes that will help you organize your findings when you come to write up your review). If you are using an electronic form of note taking, you might note these descriptors in a separate field (e.g. in RefWorks, put these under User 2 or User 3; in Excel have a separate column for each descriptor; if you use Inspiration, you might attach a separate note for key descriptors.
12 Evaluate your references for currency and coverage: Although you can always find more articles on your topic, you have to decide at what point you are finished with collecting new resources so that you can focus on writing up your findings. However, before you begin writing, you must evaluate your reference list to ensure that it is up to date and has reported the most current work. Typically a review will cover the last five years, but should also refer to any landmark studies prior to this time if they have significance in shaping the direction of the field. If you include studies prior to the past five years that are not landmark studies, you should defend why you have chosen these rather than more current ones.
Step 5: Summarize the literature in table or concept map format
Galvan (2006) recommends building tables as a key way to help you overview, organize, and summarize your findings, and suggests that including one or more of the tables that you create may be helpful in your literature review. If you do include tables as part of your review each must be accompanied by an analysis that summarizes, interprets and synthesizes the literature that you have charted in the table. You can plan your table or do the entire summary chart of your literature using a concept map (such as using Inspiration)
12 You can create the table using the table feature within Microsoft Word, or can create it initially in Excel and then copy and paste/import the the Excel sheet into Word once you have completed the table in Excel. The advantage of using Excel is that it enables you to sort your findings according to a variety of factors (e.g. sort by date, and then by author; sort by methodology and then date)
12 Examples of tables that may be relevant to your review:
12 Definitions of key terms and concepts.
12 Research methods
12 Summary of research results
Step 6: Synthesize the literature prior to writing your review
Using the notes that you have taken and summary tables, develop an outline of your final review. The following are the key steps as outlined by Galvan (2006: 71-79)
13 Consider your purpose and voice before beginning to write. In the case of this Educ 7001 introductory literature review, your initial purpose is to provide an overview of the topic that is of interest to you, demonstrating your understanding of key works and concepts within your chosen area of focus. You are also developing skills in reviewing and writing, to provide a foundation on which you will build in subsequent courses within your M.Ed. and ultimately in your final project. In your final project your literature review should demonstrate your command of your field of study and/or establishing context for a study that you have done.
14 Consider how you reassemble your notes: plan how you will organize your findings into a unique analysis of the picture that you have captured in your notes. Important: A literature review is not series of annotations (like an annotated bibliography). Galvan (2006:72) captures the difference between an annotated bibliography and a literature review very well: “…in essence, like describing trees when you really should be describing a forest. In the case of a literature review, you are really creating a new forest, which you will build by using the trees you found in the literature you read.”
15 Create a topic outline that traces your argument: first explain to the reader your line or argument (or thesis); then your narrative that follows should explain and justify your line of argument. You may find the program Inspiration useful in mapping out your argument (and once you have created this in a concept map form, Inspiration enables you to convert this to a text outline merely by clicking on the “outline” button). This can then be exported into a Microsoft Word document.
16 Reorganize your notes according to the path of your argument
17 Within each topic heading, note differences among studies.
18 Within each topic heading, look for obvious gaps or areas needing more research.
19 Plan to describe relevant theories.
20 Plan to discuss how individual studies relate to and advance theory
21 Plan to summarize periodically and, again near the end of the review
22 Plan to present conclusions and implications
23 Plan to suggest specific directions for future research near the end of the review
24 Flesh out your outline with details from your analysis
Step 7: Writing the review (Galvan, 2006: 81-90)
25 Identify the broad problem area, but avoid global statements
26 Early in the review, indicate why the topic being reviewed is important
27 Distinguish between research finding and other sources of information
28 Indicate why certain studies are important
29 If you are commenting on the timeliness of a topic, be specific in describing the time frame
30 If citing a classic or landmark study, identify it as such
31 If a landmark study was replicated, mention that and indicate the results of the replication
32 Discuss other literature reviews on your topic
33 Refer the reader to other reviews on issues that you will not be discussing in details
34 Justify comments such as, “no studies were found.”
35 Avoid long lists of nonspecific references
36 If the results of previous studies are inconsistent or widely varying, cite them separately
37 Cite all relevant references in the review section of thesis, dissertation, or journal article
Step 8: Developing a coherent essay (Galvan, 2006: 91-96)
38 If your review is long, provide an overview near the beginning of the review
39 Near the beginning of a review, state explicitly what will and will not be covered
40 Specify your point of view early in the review: this serves as the thesis statement of the review.
41 Aim for a clear and cohesive essay that integrates the key details of the literature and communicates your point of view (a literature is not a series of annotated articles).
42 Use subheadings, especially in long reviews
43 Use transitions to help trace your argument
44 If your topic teaches across disciplines, consider reviewing studies from each discipline separately
45 Write a conclusion for the end of the review: Provide closure so that the path of the argument ends with a conclusion of some kind. How you end the review, however, will depend on your reason for writing it. If the review was written to stand alone, as is the case of a term paper or a review article for publication, the conclusion needs to make clear how the material in the body of the review has supported the assertion or proposition presented in the introduction. On the other hand, a review in a thesis, dissertation, or journal article presenting original research usually leads to the research questions that will be addressed.
46 Check the flow of your argument for coherence.

发表回响